Effects of model resolution, physics, and coupling on Southern Hemisphere storm tracks in CESM1.3

d651044
 
Abstract:

Two high-resolution versions of a coupled Earth system model (CESM1.3: 0.25 degree atmosphere, 1 degree ocean; CESM1.1: 0.25 degree atmosphere, 0.1 degree ocean) are compared to the standard resolution CESM1.1 and CESM1.3 (1 degree atmosphere, 1 degree ocean). The CESM1.3 versions are documented, and the consequences of model resolution, air-sea coupling, and physics in the atmospheric models are studied with regards to storm tracks in the Southern Hemisphere as represented by 850 hPa eddy kinetic energy. Increasing the resolution from 1 degree to 0.25 degree in the atmosphere (same physics) coupled to the 1 degree ocean intensifies the strength of the storm tracks closer to observations. The 0.25 degree atmosphere with the older CESM1.1 physics coupled to the 0.1 degree ocean has fewer low clouds, warmer Southern Ocean SSTs, a weaker meridional temperature gradient, and a degraded storm track simulation compared to the 0.25 degree atmosphere with CESM1.3 physics coupled to the 1 degree ocean. Therefore, deficient physics in the atmospheric model can negate the gains attained by higher resolution in atmosphere and ocean.

Temporal Range:
1965-01 to 2005-12
Variables:
Rain
Temporal Frequencies:
Monthly Climatology, Daily Climatology
Data Types:
Grid
Data Contributors:
UCAR/NCAR/CGD
Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Total Volume:
740.96 GB (Entire dataset) Volume details by dataset product
Data Formats:
Metadata Record:
Data License:
Citation counts are compiled through information provided by publicly-accessible APIs according to the guidelines developed through the https://makedatacount.org/ project. If journals do not provide citation information to these publicly-accessible services, then this citation information will not be included in RDA citation counts. Additionally citations that include dataset DOIs are the only types included in these counts, so legacy citations without DOIs, references found in publication acknowledgements, or references to a related publication that describes a dataset will not be included in these counts.